Part of: Mace Federal Removal (Berg v. Bryant → D.S.C.) · Berg v. Bryant (and Bryant's Third-Party Complaint against Mace) · Assignment Desk Works, LLC v. Alexis Berg · Musgrave v. Mace (2:25-cv-01823-RMG) · Litigation Overview & Court-Filing Index
Patrick Bryant: 'Today I authorized my attorneys to file a temporary restraining order against Nancy Ruth Mace'
On November 17, 2025, Judge Donald B. Hocker entered an order in Berg v. Bryant ending pseudonym use in the case, ruling that the identities of the plaintiff and a witness were already known to the public. Bryant announced a temporary restraining order motion the same day.
Reporting by ABC News 4 and FITSNews covered the ruling and the related filings.
On November 17, 2025, Judge Donald B. Hocker of the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas entered an order in Berg v. Bryant (No. 2025-CP-10-03124) that ended the use of pseudonyms in the case. The court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym and granted defendant Patrick Bryant's motion to identify the "Jane Doe Witness," finding that the identities of both the plaintiff and the witness "are already known to all Parties and the public such that neither Plaintiff nor Jane Doe Witness have any privacy interest to preserve." From the date of the order, all future filings were required to use the parties' true and correct names.
Bryant announced a motion for a temporary restraining order against Rep. Nancy Mace on the same day and described the pseudonym ruling publicly.
The Order
Page 1 of the order, Case No. 2025-CP-10-03124, Charleston County Court of Common Pleas. Caption: "Order Denying Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym and Granting Defendant Patrick Bryant's Motion to Identify 'Jane Doe Witness.'"
Page 2: legal standard and findings. The court cited James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 1993) and Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246 (4th Cir. 2014) on the public right of access to judicial proceedings.
Page 3: ruling and signature. "Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under a Pseudonym is DENIED, and Defendant Bryant's Motion to Identify is GRANTED." Signed by the Honorable Donald B. Hocker. "IT IS SO ORDERED."
Page 4: South Carolina electronic-filing certification. Charleston Common Pleas, Case No. 2025CP1003124, "Order/Other," electronically signed by Circuit Court Judge s/Donald B. Hocker (Judge Code 2167) on November 17, 2025. The "Electronically Filed" stamp runs down the right margin of every page.
Bryant's Announcement
On November 17, 2025, Bryant posted publicly about the ruling and his restraining order motion:
Patrick Bryant's public Facebook post, November 17, 2025, reproduced from facebook.com/bpatrickbryant; he posted the same statement on X. The verbatim text follows.
"Today I authorized my attorneys to file a temporary restraining order against Nancy Ruth Mace in hopes of stopping her lies, which I know the whole world appreciates."
On the pseudonym ruling:
"And I just learned this morning that the judge ruled that 'Jane Doe', who is Alexis 'Ali' Berg, can no longer remain anonymous. The same applies to the 'witness,' Melissa Britton. From this point forward, there are no Jane Does. All parties must be referred to by their real names."
On his motion against Mace:
"This restraining order is intended to prevent Nancy Ruth Mace from continuing to publish baseless claims about me on social media without offering a single piece of actual evidence. For two years she has used her platforms to defame me while producing nothing to support her allegations."
Bryant attached the caption page of his motion to the post. By that filing, the case caption already used the parties' real names, as the court's order required:
Caption page of Bryant's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (and Renewed Motion for In Camera Review), Berg v. Bryant, No. 2025-CP-10-03124, the image Bryant attached to his post. The caption reads "Alexis Berg, Plaintiff/Counterclaimee" and "Nancy Ruth Mace and Melissa Britton, Third Party Defendants," using the parties' real names following the de-anonymization order.
Mace denies Bryant's allegations and Bryant denies Mace's. No related criminal charges have been filed against Bryant. The dispute is the subject of ongoing civil litigation. See Berg v. Bryant (No. 2025-CP-10-03124).
Sources and related coverage
- The order itself: Order Denying Pseudonym Motion and Granting Motion to Identify (PDF, 4 pages), Case No. 2025-CP-10-03124, Judge Donald B. Hocker, entered November 17, 2025.
- ABC News 4: coverage of the restraining order filing
- FITSNews: "Where Is the Video? Court Filings Challenge Nancy Mace's Story" (November 18, 2025)
- Patrick Bryant on X: Bryant's announcement post
- Patrick Bryant on Facebook: source of the quoted statement above
- Case hub: Berg v. Bryant (No. 2025-CP-10-03124)
