An Independent Public Record

MACEOPEDIA


The Public Record

Tag

x

5 entries across the record carry this tag. Browse all dispatches, or jump to a group below.

Dispatches

  • Candace Owens Plays a Nancy Mace Clip. Mace Answers 'Nothing Funny About Dead Children.' Owens Answers With a News Report on a Lawsuit Against Mace. Mace Answers With a Cat-Licking Meme.

    On October 9, 2026, Candace Owens played a clip of Nancy Mace on her show, calling it 'objectively hilarious.' In the clip, as Owens aired it, Mace says: 'Every time you call a friend, like, hey, do you want to hang out? They're like, no, I'm just, I have plans to kill my kids tonight. What?' At noon Mace posted the clip herself and wrote: 'There is absolutely NOTHING funny about dead children... Is this a cry for help?' At 3:30 PM Owens answered with a screenshot of an ABC News 4 report on a lawsuit against Mace and an insult in her own voice. At 5:03 PM Mace posted a line drawing of a woman drawn as Owens licking a hairless cat, with the words 'Candy - this you?' Every quote is verbatim and every claim about the lawsuit belongs to the people who made it. Maceopedia reaches no conclusion about the lawsuit and assigns no one a motive.

  • Nancy Mace breaks with Trump on his $5,000 "dividend" check - again, on her own show

    Donald Trump promised a $5,000 "Trump dividend" if Republicans win the midterms. Nancy Mace replied on X: "No one is getting a $5k check." Then she went further on her own show, running the $1.3 trillion math on camera and asking why $5,000 is a "dividend" when $1,400 was "Venezuela."

  • "262 times in 36 hours": Mace's X habit becomes the story

    On November 20, 2024, former Mace communications director Natalie Johnson called out the sheer volume of Nancy Mace's X posts about the Capitol bathroom fight, writing that Mace had tweeted 262 times in 36 hours about a bill aimed at one incoming member of Congress. The post became a clean public marker for a broader pattern: X posts flagged for hateful conduct, official-account replies aimed at private citizens, and later disputed reporting that former staffers were told to use burner accounts to boost her online.

  • Was this the voyeurism Nancy Mace was talking about?

    Nancy Mace posted that voyeurism is a real issue. The clearest test of what she means is her own May 20, 2025 House Oversight hearing, which she titled 'Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces,' where she held up a poster-sized still she said showed her own body and called it nonconsensual hidden surveillance. Maceopedia asks the narrower public-record question her hearing never answered: was that a hidden camera in a private space, or footage from a room with open windows facing a public or shared space? The two are not the same factual claim, and voyeurism turns on the difference.

  • In an X thread, Mace says the amount should be higher. The public-record receipt says the earlier number was tied to photos.

    After Maceopedia resurfaced the Berg-call line about '150K each,' Rep. Nancy Mace replied that the amount 'should be more' and connected the thread to 'what was done to me and others.' The public-record receipt matters because the recorded call discusses a civil lawsuit, photos, and money, not an adjudicated criminal finding.