Mace Goes Pro Se, Moves to Pause State Case While Appealing Federal Ruling
After cycling through 23 attorneys since 2023, Rep. Nancy Mace is now representing herself pro se in the Bryant v. Mace state case. According to court filings, she filed motions last week asking the Charleston County court to stay proceedings while she appeals the federal remand order.
After burning through twenty-three attorneys since late 2023, Rep. Nancy Mace is representing herself again in the defamation case that Patrick Bryant filed against her.
According to court filings reviewed by Maceopedia, Mace filed pro se motions last week in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas asking the state court to stay proceedings in the third-party complaint against her while she pursues a federal appeal.
How she got here
On September 4, 2026, U.S. District Judge Bruce H. Hendricks issued a remand order in Civil Action No. 2:26-cv-305-BHH, rejecting Mace's attempt to keep the defamation claims in federal court. Judge Hendricks found her removal bid "untimely by several measures" and ordered the case back to South Carolina state court (Charleston County docket 2025-CP-10-03124).
The remand order left Mace with one narrow path to stay in federal court: an appeal premised on a federal-officer removal theory. Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1447(d), a remand order is ordinarily unreviewable, but a federal-officer removal exception allows the losing party to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
According to court filings, Mace is pursuing that appeal. At the same time, she filed motions in state court asking that the Charleston County proceedings be paused while the federal appeal is pending.
Her third pro se stint
This appears to be at least Mace's third stint representing herself in the Bryant litigation without retained counsel. Her first pro se appearance came in January 2026, when she filed a letter relieving her prior attorneys. A second pro se stretch followed in June and July 2026.
The full roster of her twenty-three attorneys, along with the timeline of each engagement, is tracked at maceopedia.org/wiki/nancy-mace-lawyers.
Sources: Court filings, Charleston County Court of Common Pleas docket 2025-CP-10-03124; Federal remand order, 2:26-cv-305-BHH (Maceopedia, Sept. 4, 2026); Nancy Mace's 23 Attorneys (Maceopedia)
Read next
September 14, 2026 · DispatchAfter 23 Lawyers, Nancy Mace Is Now Pro Se
After cycling through 23 different attorneys since 2023, Nancy Mace is now representing herself in court, including in the third-party complaint against her in the Berg litigation. This is the timeline, with every date and every case.
October 29, 2026 · DispatchNancy Mace Backed Ending Daylight Saving Time. Then She Didn't Show Up to Vote On It.
Nancy Mace was recorded Not Voting on the July 14 passage vote, and in her final year in Congress she missed a higher share of roll calls than all but two of the 426 members on the Clerk's record for every roll call. Through September 16 she was Not Voting on 103 of 314 roll calls, 32.8 percent. Two members missed more, and both told the public why. For July 13 and 14, and for most of her other missed votes, we found no reason from her. Her absence did not change the 308 to 117 result, and the Senate has not acted. This page sets the Clerk's record beside her posts, with every source.
October 27, 2026 · DispatchNancy Mace Keeps Clashing With Her Own Party, One Week Before Election Day
In a week the retiring congresswoman has taken on the Vice President's defense of an Ohio ad, her party's spending in South Carolina, her own committee and the Iran war. Some of it breaks with Trump's camp. Some does not.
October 23, 2026 · DispatchNancy Mace, Then and Now
What Nancy Mace said early in her career, set beside what she said later, on Donald Trump, the independent voice, Muslims and Ilhan Omar, gay and transgender Americans, and friends and enemies. Her own words, dated and attributed, with her explanations.
October 22, 2026 · DispatchNancy Mace is leaving Congress. Why, and what is next?
Nancy Mace recorded her goodbye to Congress at home on Oct. 22, 2026. She leaves the U.S. House on Jan. 3, 2027, and gives four reasons: a term-limit promise, press coverage she calls false, threats, and fatigue. Each is set beside the public record, from her 2020 win to fifth place in the June 9 governor primary, along with reasons she did not list: a House Ethics review with no announced result, and $176,206.28 in campaign payments to two law firms that the FEC filings describe only as legal fees, with no FEC investigation on the public record. Then the race for her seat and the media business she is building next.
October 21, 2026 · DispatchNancy Mace's campaign paid her lawsuit lawyers $176,206
FEC filings show Nancy Mace for Congress paid $176,206.28 in six months, from Dec. 22, 2025 to June 15, 2026, to two law firms: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP ($150,000 in three payments) and Moorman Law Firm LLC ($26,206.28). Those are the two firms on the signature block of the defamation suit Mace filed in May 2025 against Eric Bowman, which her complaint says she brought as a private citizen. The campaign had reported about $24,264 in legal fees in the seven years before, and it reported $0.00 in receipts for January through June 2026. Every filing line says only legal fees. No public record shows what the payments covered, and there is no finding of any violation and no FEC matter on the public record. This documentary, about fifteen minutes with a Short, lays out the filings, the court record and her own words.