Part of: Assignment Desk Works, LLC v. Alexis Berg · Musgrave v. Mace (2:25-cv-01823-RMG) · Abortion & Reproductive Rights · Litigation Overview & Court-Filing Index
The Record: What Nancy Mace Has Said About Being Sexually Assaulted, Whom She Told, and What Reached Authorities
Maceopedia ·

Nancy Mace has spoken about sexual violence more, and more publicly, than almost anyone in Congress. She has described her own assaults on the floor of two legislatures and on national television, built legislation around them, and introduced herself to a national convention as a survivor. This entry does one narrow thing: it assembles the public record of what she has said, whom she has said she told, and what is known to have reached the authorities, in each instance she has made public.
Everything below is either Mace's own dated, public words or mainstream reporting, each with a link. It names no private accuser. It documents her February 2025 House floor allegations only as statements she made, notes that the men she named deny them, notes that no court has ruled on their truth and that the parties are under a gag order, and takes no position on whether any contested allegation is true or false. The value here is the record itself. The reader draws the conclusions.
The assaults she has described from her teenage years
Mace has said publicly, since 2019, that she was sexually assaulted twice as a girl in the South Carolina Lowcountry, and that she reported neither at the time.
She first disclosed it in 2019, during the South Carolina House debate over a "fetal heartbeat" abortion bill, while arguing to keep an exception for rape and incest. As the Associated Press reported, she told the chamber:
"For some of us who have been raped, it can take 25 years to get up the courage and talk about being a victim of rape. My mother and my best friend in high school were the only two people who knew."
In the days after, she gave The Post and Courier the fullest account. The paper reported that Mace was 16 when she was raped by "a friend and classmate," that she told only her mother and her best friend, and that she did not go to the police because she was "afraid and ashamed about what people would think." She was 17 when she dropped out of high school. She said she had also been sexually assaulted a second time, at 14. In her own words to the paper:
"It took me a long time to say that it wasn't my fault. That I didn't cause it. That it happened."
That she kept these private for decades is not a criticism. It is her own consistent account, and it is the ordinary reality of assault: as she herself noted on the floor, most survivors never report. It is recorded here because reporting, and the reasons a survivor does or does not report, is the thread this entry follows. Mace's own stated reason, at 16, was fear and shame. The full account of these years, in her own memoir and her later disclosures, is set out in a companion entry: In Her Own Words: the high-school rumors in Mace's memoir, and the rape she revealed years later.
The Citadel: an incident she says was reported, and acted on
There is one episode from Mace's young adulthood that, by her own telling, was reported and produced a consequence. In her 2001 memoir, In the Company of Men: A Woman at The Citadel, she describes learning that a fellow cadet had, as NBC News summarized the passage in 2013, "stood behind me and simulated having sex with me from the rear." In her words: "I was mortified and furious." NBC reported the outcome plainly: "He was eventually disciplined."
The memoir does not spell out the reporting mechanism, and her father, Gen. Emory Mace, was the Commandant of Cadets at the time, so the path by which it was handled is not fully documented. But it stands in the record as the one assault-adjacent incident from her youth that she describes as having been surfaced and answered rather than kept silent.
A political identity built on being a survivor
Since 2019, Mace has made her survivor history central to her public life and her legislative agenda. The public record includes, among others:
- 2019, the rape and incest exception. During the South Carolina "heartbeat" bill debate, Mace's own amendment preserved exceptions for rape and incest. When a colleague circulated material she found dismissive of rape victims, she answered: "No woman chooses to or asks to be raped."
- 2022, Face the Nation. Weeks before Roe v. Wade fell, she told CBS: "I am pro-life, but I do support exceptions for rape. I'm a rape victim myself."
- 2024, the Republican National Convention. In her prime-time speech, as the Washington Examiner reported, she introduced herself to delegates as a "single mom and rape survivor."
- 2024, This Week. Pressed by George Stephanopoulos about endorsing Donald Trump after he was found civilly liable for sexual abuse, she said: "I find it offensive that as a rape victim you're trying to shame me for my political choices," and, "I live with shame."
- 2024, the House restroom resolution and the "Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act." Defending a resolution restricting transgender members' restroom access, she invoked her history; as Daily Signal and Forbes reported her remarks to reporters at the Capitol, she said, "I'm a victim of abuse myself. I'm a rape survivor. I have PTSD from the abuse I've suffered at the hands of a man."
- The Rape Shield Enhancement Act and the VOYEURS bills. She introduced legislation to strengthen rape-shield protections and to create civil and criminal liability for nonconsensual filming, saying, "As a survivor, I know firsthand how important it is to protect our privacy and dignity."
- May 2025, a House Oversight hearing on surveillance in private spaces. She testified: "I didn't know that I had been filmed. I didn't give my consent. I didn't give my permission," and, "Liberty begins with the right to close a door."
- November 2025, the Epstein Files Transparency Act. As the House passed the bill 427-1, she said from the floor, "Today is a historic day for every survivor across the country."
By any measure, Mace is one of the most vocal advocates for survivors in Congress, and she has said so herself, repeatedly and on the record.
What she has reported to law enforcement
Mace has also been a consistent and documented reporter of threats against her to the police. Her office has said she receives well over a thousand credible threats a year, and the public record shows multiple cases she referred that led to arrests and charges:
- December 2024: A man, James McIntyre, was arrested by U.S. Capitol Police and charged after an incident on Capitol grounds.
- January 2025: Capitol Police alerted her to an online death threat; the man who posted it, Shawn Monper, was arrested.
- May 2025: Samuel Theodore Cain was charged after an X post threatening to shoot her, and was denied bond.
These are recorded here for the same reason the rest of the record is: this entry follows the question of what Mace reports, to whom, and when.
February 10, 2025: the accusations she made on the House floor
On the evening of February 10, 2025, Mace delivered a roughly 53-minute speech on the floor of the U.S. House, broadcast on C-SPAN, in which she accused four named men of sexual crimes: her former fiance, Patrick Bryant, and three others, Eric Bowman, John Osborne, and Brian Musgrave. All four have publicly and categorically denied the allegations. The matter is the subject of active civil litigation, no court has ruled on whether the accusations are true, and the parties are under a gag order. Maceopedia takes no position on the truth of any of it. What follows is only the public, documented record of what was said and what reached the authorities.
The relationship, by the public record. Bryant proposed to Mace in May 2022, per The Post and Courier. They broke up in November 2023, as both the Post and Courier and the SC Daily Gazette reported.
Her own stated timeline of the alleged conduct. In the speech, as the SC Daily Gazette reported, Mace said the alleged rape occurred in 2022, at a function at an Isle of Palms property, after she "had two vodka sodas and blacked out": "I was raped that night." She said she discovered evidence later; as Newsweek quoted her directly from the floor: "In November 2023, I accidentally uncovered some of the most heinous crimes against women imaginable." November 2023 is also the month she and Bryant broke up.
What reached law enforcement, and when. By her own account, Mace reported what she found to law enforcement, and the record bears out that a report reached the authorities in December 2023. Mace has said publicly and repeatedly that she took her evidence to the police. As a sitting member of Congress, she brought the matter to the U.S. Capitol Police, and the Capitol Police in turn referred it to the State Law Enforcement Division. SLED has confirmed that end of the chain directly: in its own spokesperson's words, quoted by Newsweek, its investigation opened on December 14, 2023, "after being contacted by the United States Capitol Police," with Patrick Bryant as its subject. The Post and Courier reported the same origin, that the probe "was opened in mid-December 2023 after U.S. Capitol Police contacted state authorities." The complaint in the related Berg v. Bryant case, a public filing, likewise states that in December 2023 Mace reported what she found to federal law enforcement, who referred the case to SLED. SLED has described its case as substantive and ongoing, with "multiple interviews" and "multiple search warrants." As of February 2026, more than two years in, it remained open, with only Bryant publicly named and no charges announced.
One point still disputed. Mace has also said she turned evidence over to the South Carolina Attorney General. That specific claim his office publicly disputed. As Newsweek quoted the attorney general's spokesman: "our office has not received any reports or requests for assistance from any law enforcement or prosecution agencies regarding these matters," and the attorney general "had no role and no knowledge of these allegations until her public statements." His office called her characterization of contacting him "categorically false." That dispute concerns the attorney general's office specifically. It does not change the Capitol Police and SLED trail above, which SLED itself has confirmed.
Her stated position on why it went to the floor. Mace has framed herself as failed by a slow and unresponsive justice system. Of the still-open SLED case, she told the Post and Courier in February 2026: "We're over two years in and I don't understand. I just feel so helpless, and I just feel so hopeless." Her account is that she pursued the matter through official channels, felt stonewalled, and spoke publicly out of frustration.
The denials. All four men denied the allegations in the days after the speech, per The Post and Courier:
- Patrick Bryant: "I categorically deny these allegations. I take this matter seriously and will cooperate fully with any necessary legal processes to clear my name."
- Eric Bowman: "I unequivocally deny all the allegations made against me which are baseless, repugnant and defamatory."
- John Osborne: "The claims are categorically untrue and it is completely unfair to be looped in to such accusations from her."
- Brian Musgrave: the statement "is a dangerous mix of falsehoods and baseless accusations, recklessly leveled at four individuals without a shred of evidence."
The litigation, and what the courts have and have not decided. Musgrave sued Mace for defamation. On August 20, 2025, U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel dismissed that suit, but on immunity grounds, not on the merits: after the government substituted the United States as defendant under the Westfall Act, the claim was not legally cognizable. The court was explicit that this was not a ruling on truth or falsity; as the Post and Courier reported, the judge indicated some of the defamation claims "might have had merit if not for the Westfall Act." Separately, on November 26, 2025, retired Circuit Judge Donald B. Hocker imposed a gag order on all parties in the consolidated state-court cases, barring public communication about them. Hocker wrote that the allegations "have yet to be proven true or false in a court of law." In January 2026, attorneys for Bryant and Bowman filed a motion asking the court to hold Mace in civil contempt for alleged violations of that gag order; as of the latest public reporting, the court had not ruled on it.
For the site's standing, denial-forward treatment of the people named in these disputes, see People in the Public Record.
The record, laid out
Set in one place, the public record is this. Mace has said she was assaulted at 14 and raped at 16, and did not report either, out of fear and shame. She has described one Citadel-era incident that was reported and disciplined. She has built a decade of public advocacy on being a survivor, and has repeatedly and successfully referred threats against herself to the Capitol Police. And in February 2025 she made grave criminal accusations against four named men from the floor of the House, where speech is constitutionally immune from a defamation suit; the men deny them; by her own account, and consistent with SLED's confirmation that it was contacted by the U.S. Capitol Police, she had reported the matter to the Capitol Police, who referred it to SLED, whose investigation opened on December 14, 2023 and remains open without charges, though the attorney general's office disputes her separate claim that she contacted it; and the courts have dismissed one suit on immunity without ruling on truth while gagging the parties in the others.
Maceopedia draws no conclusion from this record and asserts no contested allegation as fact. It is set out in full, in her own words and the public reporting, so that readers can see the whole of it and weigh it for themselves.
A note on sourcing and scope
Every quotation above is Mace's own public statement or is reported by the linked outlet. No private, sealed, privileged, or gag-covered material was used. The person Mace has described as attacking her in her teenage years is not named by her in these public accounts and is not named here. The four men named in the February 2025 speech are named only because Mace named them publicly and because they have publicly responded; their denials are included, and this entry takes no position on the truth of the allegations, which remain unadjudicated and under a court gag order.
If you or someone you know needs help, the National Sexual Assault Hotline is available 24/7 at 1-800-656-4673 (RAINN).

Read next
August 30, 2026 · DispatchIn Her Own Words: The High-School Rumors in Mace's Memoir, and the Rape She Revealed Years Later
July 20, 2026 · Dispatch"The one I'm already in": Mace's Senate withdrawal was a statement about the case, made under a gag order that has never been lifted
Rep. Nancy Mace's July 20, 2026 announcement that she will not run for the Senate was, in both the video and the written statement, an announcement about litigation. She said she was leaving the race 'not because I'm backing down from a fight, but because the one I'm already in matters right now,' told supporters she has 'unfinished business,' and dated that business to the day she 'stood on that House floor.' That was February 10, 2025, when she named four men and told them they had 'bought yourself a one-way ticket to hell.' Three of those men are parties to Berg v. Bryant, where a gag order barring comment on the case was extended indefinitely in December 2025 and, on the documentary record, has never been vacated, dissolved, or found expired. It has also never been enforced. Mace contends it is unconstitutional.
July 6, 2026 · DispatchPro Se: Nancy Mace has lost her lawyers again, this time in her own defamation suit against Eric Bowman
On July 6, 2026, Rep. Nancy Mace filed a Motion to Lift Stay in her own defamation case against Eric Bowman, and she filed it pro se, representing herself. On the coversheet she crossed out the entire 'Plaintiff's Attorney' block by hand, wrote 'N/A,' and wrote 'Pro Se.' The motion states she 'is now proceeding pro se in this matter, as reflected in the Notice filed June 30, 2026.' It is the second time in this cluster of cases she has gone without counsel. The three attorneys who filed and briefed the Bowman case for her, local counsel Andrew B. Moorman, Sr. and the two Washington lawyers she brought in pro hac vice, William M. Sullivan, Jr. and Alex G. Anderson, are no longer her counsel of record. A separate notice filed the same day names all three and asks the Clerk of Court to remove them. The complete eight-page motion, and the counsel-withdrawal notice, are reproduced below. Allegations on every side are contested and unproven; Bowman denies Mace's claims and has moved to dismiss, and Mace denies Bowman's.
June 9, 2026 · DispatchUnder a gag order barring 'any comment about any aspect of this case,' Mace uses her televised concession speech to talk about 'predators that got away in my case'
On the night of June 9, 2026, after conceding the South Carolina Republican gubernatorial primary, Nancy Mace told her Charleston election-night crowd, and a live television audience, that she had talked to Attorney General Alan Wilson 'about my case' and would help his administration ensure that 'predators that got away in my case … we finally put criminals behind bars.' Mace is a third-party defendant in Berg v. Bryant, where a November 26, 2025 gag order bars every party from 'making or publishing any comment about any aspect of this case' or about any party or person connected to it, and a January 12, 2026 civil-contempt motion over her earlier public statements remains pending. Both orders are reproduced in full below. Mace contends the gag order is unconstitutional; all underlying allegations are unproven and contested, and no court has ruled on the June 9 remarks.
January 27, 2026 · DispatchMace Calls ADW's Breach-of-Contract Suit a 'Fishing Expedition,' Moves to Dismiss It, Despite Not Being a Party
On January 27, 2026, Rep. Nancy Mace, not a party to ADW v. Berg, a breach-of-contract case between her company and a former employee, filed an Emergency Motion to Intervene, seeking to dismiss the suit, impose sanctions on both sides' attorneys, and block all discovery. Mace signed the motion herself, as a pro se litigant, and certified that she had skipped the required meet-and-confer with opposing counsel because, in her judgment, it 'would not be productive.' ADW v. Berg is a civil case in Charleston County; no findings of fact have been made.
January 27, 2026 · Dispatch'This Court Now Stands as the Only Barrier': Mace Files Sworn Emergency Motion to Gag Opposing Lawyers
On January 27, 2026, Nancy Mace filed a sworn, verified Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order in the ADW v. Berg civil case, asking a Charleston County judge to bar opposing counsel, Patrick Bryant, and Berg's attorneys from accessing or using materials she called privileged. The motion — signed under oath by Mace personally — also places her gubernatorial candidacy on the official court record.