An Independent Public Record

MACEOPEDIA


The Public Record

Tag

fitsnews

24 entries across the record carry this tag. Browse all dispatches, or jump to a group below.

Dispatches

  • Nancy Mace Told Her She Was Assaulted, Then Talked About Suing for a Million Dollars

    On her first recorded call with the alleged assault victim, April 6, 2024, Rep. Nancy Mace said: I believe you were assaulted. She said she would sue her ex fiance Patrick Bryant, and put the payout at 150K each, a million dollars, or whatever that number is, six times 150. The call offered no resource, advocate or option of any kind. Her filed Answer admits she told the alleged assault victim she had seen a video on Bryant's phone; no agency has produced or cited a video recording. The three men SLED charged in October 2026 deny wrongdoing and are presumed innocent, and Mace denies any conspiracy. Audio: FITSNews.

  • "She Would Have and Should Have Been Sued Into Bankruptcy": Three South Carolina Prosecutors on Nancy Mace's Accusations Against Brian Musgrave

    Three of South Carolina's senior prosecutors reviewed the state investigation of Rep. Nancy Mace's accusations, and each wrote, in a letter now public, that her public accusations against Brian Musgrave lacked evidence. Ninth Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson called them 'spurious claims' resting on 'the lack of even a scintilla of evidence' (Aug. 14, 2026). Fourteenth Circuit Solicitor Duffie Stone wrote that her statements 'branding Brian Musgrave a predator, a rapist, and a human trafficker are shocking' (Aug. 18). Sixteenth Circuit Solicitor Kevin Brackett wrote that 'there is not one speck of evidence' and that, had she not been protected by the Constitution, she 'would have and should have been sued into bankruptcy' (Aug. 21). FITSNews and ABC News 4 published the letters on Oct. 14, 2026. The letters are shown here. Musgrave has always denied the accusations. Mace has not retracted them.

  • "IDK who needs to hear this, but a consensual gangbang is not a rape": Nancy Mace posts it, and the reply section answers

    On the night of October 8, 2026, Rep. Nancy Mace posted on X: 'IDK who needs to hear this, but a consensual gangbang is not a rape.' Most replies read it as a comment on the Cornell Chi Phi lawsuit. The reply section answered with a wave of 'I defer to your expertise' and 'speaking from experience' jokes. On her first recorded call with Ali Berg, in April 2024, Mace told Berg, who said she had no memory of the night, 'There's no way in hell you consented to it based on what I saw.' Her own words, side by side.

  • Nancy Mace told a woman she had been sexually assaulted, then immediately pivoted to how to sue her ex-fiancé for "a million dollars"

    On Nancy Mace's first recorded call with Ali Berg (April 6, 2024), Mace tells Berg she believes she was assaulted and, on the same call, lays out suing her ex-fiancé: 'it costs him a million dollars, or whatever that number is, six times 150.' Mace names the man she says she was told assaulted Berg once, with the word 'maybe,' and says 'I don't know if it was him.' On the same call she refers to suing her ex-fiancé twelve times and describes how he would pay. Two new videos group the lines by topic, each verbatim, with a clock showing when it was said.

  • On her first recorded call with Ali Berg, Mace lays out a civil suit against Patrick Bryant: 'He can sell a building or two, settle, be done' and accusers 'can get 150 K each'

    FITSNews published the full audio of Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Ali Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace asks the call stay 'private,' spends little time on the alleged assault or the man she names as the assailant, never offers a victim advocate or a referral to law enforcement, and instead pitches a civil lawsuit against her ex-fiancé Patrick Bryant, predicting he will 'sell a building or two, settle,' and that accusers could 'get 150 K each.'

  • "You have to hit him in his pocketbook with a civil suit": the first recorded call with Ali Berg, in her own words

    A produced supercut of Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Ali Berg (April 6, 2024), published by FITSNews on June 7, 2026, after the recording was produced in ADW v. Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace pitched a civil lawsuit and a payout, never suggested Berg go to the police, and never offered Berg a victim advocate or counselor.

  • Leaked Call Details Origins of Nancy Mace's 'Scorched Earth' Campaign

    FITSNews obtained a recording of an approximately 45-minute call between Mace and Alexis 'Ali' Berg, the woman whose allegations became central to Mace's public campaign against her former fiancé Patrick Bryant; raising questions about how the allegations evolved from a private conversation into a national political narrative.

  • Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary Pokes Fun at Nancy Mace's 'Tits'

    At a March 17, 2026 St. Patrick's Day roast in Charleston, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent mocked Mace with a crude 'Silicon Valley' joke about her body. One attendee disputed the exact wording, and Mace's campaign did not respond.

  • Nancy Mace Ethics Probe Deepens

    The House Office of Congressional Conduct unanimously voted to recommend further review of allegations that Mace received $9,485.46 more than her actual D.C. lodging expenses between January 2023 and May 2024; per the OCC report, Mace and three staffers allegedly declined to cooperate, prompting the OCC to recommend subpoenas.

  • Civil Case Tied to Nancy Mace Careens Deeper Into Chaos

    Judge Hocker ordered materials subpoenaed by plaintiff Alexis Berg's attorneys turned over to the court for private review, as dueling emergency motions clashed over whether materials Mace voluntarily shared in June 2025 could be used in litigation, with Mace, now representing herself, filing an 82-page emergency motion to reclaim them as privileged.

  • Nancy Mace: 'I WILL NOT BE SILENCED'

    Mace filed a five-page letter attacking Judge Hocker as running a 'kangaroo court,' fired her attorneys, announced plans to represent herself, and declared she would not comply with the gag order, while simultaneously seeking removal of the case to federal court.

  • Sanctions Showdown: New Filing Accuses Nancy Mace's Lawyers of Fabricating Legal Citations

    Patrick Bryant filed a motion seeking Rule 11 sanctions after Mace's attorneys allegedly submitted fabricated case citations and false quotations in a court memorandum, then distributed an 'amended' version without disclosing the original errors, with the filing suggesting AI-generated legal research as a possible explanation.

  • House Ethics Committee Extends Review of Nancy Mace Matter

    The U.S. House Ethics Committee announced it was extending its review of the OCC referral concerning Mace's alleged improper lodging reimbursements, with next steps to be announced by March 2, 2026, the committee noted that an extension does not itself indicate a violation occurred.

  • Gag Order Showdown: New Motion Targets Nancy Mace

    Attorneys for Patrick Bryant and Eric Bowman filed a contempt motion seeking civil sanctions, and possible incarceration, against Mace for allegedly violating the court-ordered gag order within hours of its issuance through social media posts, campaign emails, and congressional newsletters.

  • Gagged: Judge Issues Order in Nancy Mace Case

    Retired S.C. circuit court judge Donald B. Hocker issued a gag order prohibiting Mace and other parties to the Berg-Bryant civil litigation from making any public statements about the cases, barring speech across all platforms including social media.

  • Sources: Nancy Mace Bracing for 'Another Viral Airport Video'

    FITSNews reported, citing anonymous sources, that Rep. Mace was anticipating release of footage from a separate November 21, 2024 confrontation at Reagan National Airport (DCA), a distinct, earlier episode unrelated to the October 30, 2025 Charleston airport incident. No video had been publicly released as of the report date, and the account rested on a single-source anonymous witness.

  • 'Where is the Video?': Court Filings Challenge Nancy Mace's Story

    Court filings reveal that even the plaintiff's own attorney acknowledged to the court that he did not have the video Mace claimed to have discovered; Bryant's counterclaim accuses Mace of allegedly accessing his phone without authorization, and the article reports his request for a TRO to compel in-camera review of the alleged evidence.

  • New Filings Accuse Nancy Mace of Fabricating Sexual Assault Claims

    FITSNews covered Bryant's third-party complaint accusing Mace, Melissa Britton, and Jane Doe of conspiring to fabricate sexual assault allegations for personal and political gain. Bryant denied all underlying allegations. Mace denied Bryant's account and called the filing an attempt to pay her again. All allegations are contested; litigation is active.

  • Nancy Mace Airport Incident Detailed in Police Report

    The first outlet to publish the FOIA'd Charleston airport police report, FITSNews broke the story of Mace's October 30, 2025 altercation and printed the verbatim profanity quoted by officers in their report.

  • S.C. Chief Justice Consolidates Cases Involving Nancy Mace, Former Fiancé

    South Carolina Chief Justice John Kittredge assigned retired circuit judge Donald B. Hocker to oversee five civil lawsuits and two criminal indictments stemming from Mace's February 2025 House floor speech, with the order noting that additional civil lawsuits were expected and could be added to the docket.

  • Crossroads 2026: Nancy Mace To Make 'Special Announcement' Next Week

    FITSNews previewed Mace's August 4, 2025 announcement of her bid for South Carolina governor, noting she was polling neck-and-neck with AG Alan Wilson and contextualizing the campaign launch within the ongoing controversy from her February 2025 House floor speech.

  • Bombshell Deposition: Nancy Mace's Former Strategist Unloads

    FITSNews broke the Donehue deposition story two days before the Post and Courier, publishing lengthy excerpts of Donehue's sworn testimony that Mace pressed him to blackmail Bryant and that the original complaint contained no rape or sex-trafficking claims. Mace denies the characterization; all parties are adverse in ongoing civil litigation.

  • The first recorded call with Ali Berg, April 6, 2024: full supercut, in her own words

    A produced vertical supercut of Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Alexis "Ali" Berg (April 6, 2024), published by FITSNews on June 7, 2026, after the recording was produced in ADW v. Berg. Across 44 minutes Mace pitches a civil lawsuit and a payout, never suggests Berg go to the police, and never offers Berg a victim advocate or counselor.

  • Easily all of us can get $150,000 each: the money line from Mace's first call with Ali Berg

    A 19-second vertical clip of the money line from Rep. Nancy Mace's first recorded phone call with Alexis "Ali" Berg, April 6, 2024. Rather than a referral to law enforcement or a victim advocate, Mace pitches a civil lawsuit against her ex-fiance Patrick Bryant and tells Berg a payout of about $150,000 each is realistic. FITSNews published the full audio on June 7, 2026, reporting the recording was produced in the ADW v. Berg civil litigation. Mace's allegations on the call are unproven and contested; the people she names deny wrongdoing.