‘Deaths in the MILLIONS’ | Nancy Mace Uncovers TRUTH behind Dr. Fauci

[00:00] How does arsenic get in a Twizzler? Nick, do we know how many people died from some of the decisions that Fauci made? Has there been any effort yet to sort of get at what that number might be? Yeah, so the number appears to be definitely in the millions. For the first time ever, Git Mace has a guest in the chair, and I did not book a politician, okay, very carefully. I booked a scientist who actually reads the science. Science, Nicholas Holscher is an epidemiologist. That's a scientist who tracks what makes people sick and why. He works at the McCullough Foundation in Dallas, Texas. He holds a master's degree in public health from the University of Michigan. He's dug into Anthony Fauci's diaries. That's the one where Senator Rand Paul went page by page in a U.S. Senate hearing and brought all of those secrets into broad daylight. And he's also been reading studies about the stuff that's in your pantry individually. On your kitchen table, making you sick.

[01:00] For example, the weed killer that's turning up in your organic bread. The dyes and the chemicals like arsenic turning up in your Halloween candy. He's actually read the studies that government scientists don't want you to read. Fauci told America that the lab leak was a conspiracy theory. So we're going to start with Anthony Fauci tonight, and then we're going to come for your kitchen. We're going to talk about the food that you're eating, and Nick is going to bring the science. That we want you to know about Nick Holscher. And we'll put up on the screen, Nick, your Twitter feed so people can follow you on X and on social media. Welcome tonight to Get Maced.

[02:08] Can you do me one favor right now? Hit the subscribe button. So Dr. Fauci wrote in his diary that the lab leak theory only took off because Trump was mad at China, that he had some sort of a fight with China, and that he became the target of some sort of conspiracy theory about the NIH's role in 2024. Now, later on down the road, when Senator Rand Paul had NIH's number two in the U.S. Senate, he completely contradicted it. His number two official, Lawrence Tabak, admitted under oath that the NIH funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Watch this.

[02:46] Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect that the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute. Dr. Tabak, did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through Echo Health? It depends. It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research. If you're speaking about the generic term, yes, we did. It reminds me, Nick, of when Bill Clinton, in that famous interrogation, being asked whether he had sexual relations with that woman, and he said, what is the definition of is? And Tabak said there quite clearly, it depends on what your definition of gain-of-function research, because it seems like Fauci made it a very narrow definition. But more broadly, it had more meaning. So was it a conspiracy theory or was it true, Nick?

[03:48] No, well, they called it a conspiracy theory, but it was 100% true, all of it. And this has now been verified 100% with recent, I believe it was a few months ago, declassified documents confirming that Fauci's agency, he oversaw the funneling of millions of taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

[04:19] And so it was literally confirmed that he was funding that, right? And so when we look back at that clip we just saw, he was claiming he didn't, right? And so that's obviously lying to Congress, perjury, you know, that's already a verified crime. Nick, do we know how many people died from some of the decisions that Fauci made? Has there been any effort yet to sort of get... Yeah,

[04:47] so the number appears to be definitely in the millions, right? And I say that for multiple reasons. The first reason was the gain of function activities leading to a pandemic that killed about 7 million across the globe, an inflated number of a million Americans. We know the COVID death count was artificially inflated. But regardless, we take that at face value, that's a million Americans. And why were they inflating the death count? Because when you inflate the death count, you increase perceived fear of a pathogen by the population. And so the higher the perceived fear is, the higher the vaccine uptake is. And so their goal was to maximize experimental mRNA injection uptake via maximum fear. And that benefited Big Pharma, right? Because they got money for every shot, for every jab, right? Exactly. And then would the hospitals... The hospitals will get reimbursed based on the number of... Of COVID patients too, right? So if they were inflating numbers, deaths, or people who were ill too, that would have affected a hospital's bottom line.

[05:51] Is that right? Correct, correct. And hospitals, they receive large sums of money, you know, for certain COVID incentives. But it wasn't just deaths that were inflated. It was actually case count, the total case count. That really can amplify fear. And I say that because there was a study published last October. They looked at PCR tests, right? They looked in Germany, the command center of Germany's PCR tests. They processed basically all of them. They had the PCR tests and the antibody rates of the same people. So what they found was 86% of PCR positive COVID cases in the early pandemic were not real infections, right? So only 14% of them had actual antibodies. And they had false positives, right? Wasn't that... Well, I remember... I remember vaguely getting PCR tests after PCR tests, that there were a number of false positives with those tests. So that was one of the issues, right? Yeah, exactly.

[06:52] Because they amplified what's called the cycle threshold. They ran the genetic material too many times, over 40 times. They were only supposed to run it maybe 10 times. But because they amplified it 40 times, you can theoretically detect COVID in a banana and a kiwi like some African officials did. Mm-hmm. And then one of them mysteriously... And then one of them mysteriously died a few months after that. Of course, always mysterious. But I want to jump into EcoHealth. So there was this grant that Fauci, of course, denied, paid for gain-of-function research. Fauci wrote that Trump canceled the grant called the EcoHealth Alliance, the group that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan lab without any evidence. Four years later, Biden's own HHS banned EcoHealth and its president, Peter Daszak, from federal funding of a record...

[07:45] Yeah,

[07:50] Trump got it right. Trump got it right for sure. For all the faults for him, he got that one right. Yes, yes. In 2018, EcoHealth also and the Wuhan lab pitched the Pentagon on building coronaviruses with the exact same feature that lets COVID break into human cells so easily. And a year later, a virus that features... That with these features show up in the Wuhan lab... Fauci called the report a proposal, a nothing burger. Was it really?

[08:20] No, no, it was not a nothing burger. In fact, you know, they've been modifying for decades, actually, the same group of individuals, Barrick Lab at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. You know, they've been literally publishing papers, 2014 and 2015, where they literally experimentally modified...

[08:45] ...coronaviruses, made chimeric coronaviruses to basically recognize human receptors. So they were already making these monsters, you know, in the U.S. at this lab for a long time. And this whole paper... I mean, I was going to ask, that was going to be my next question. Where is that U.S. lab that was doing that gain-of-function research? It's called the Barrick Lab at University of North Carolina. One of the things that Fauci has done, you know, we showed that he was lying about the gain-of-function research, lying about U.S. dollars paying for it, and he lied about all these things under oath. And then this summer, he was called to the Senate, recalled to the Senate by Senator Rand Paul. I called for DOJ officials to go and get the guy and arrest him a long time ago. This is not an innocent man. We're talking about an individual that gave medical advice and then needed a pardon for giving that medical advice. People need to see this. Well, I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. Well, I respectfully declined. To answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

[09:49] I respectfully declined to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. When you can't tell the truth, you plead the fifth, apparently, when you might face possible criminal charges, because that auto pin thing that Biden did to protect Fauci may not may have had a limited time frame. I want to get into food now. So one of the things now, Nick, you don't know this, but I want to get into food now. But I'm a huge super fan. I'm like such a big fan girl. If you're not following Nick, you need to follow Nick on X. I probably at least once a week forward something that you have posted, some piece of research that you've shared with my family, with my mom, with a sister, with my kids, because I want to be sure that they're educated. I didn't know. I mean, I knew a little bit about vaccinations. You know, having children, we limited the number of vaccinations that they had. Both of my kids had vaccine reactions. And one, admittedly, at 18 months, we believe may have been on the spectrum based on their symptoms.

[10:50] So I changed. Not only did I change the way that I vaccinated my children based on what had happened, I modified the way that we ate in our household, trying to eat organic food, trying to make healthy options like meat, fruit and vegetables, nothing that's in a box. Because if you have a child that may be on the spectrum as young as 18 months, you really think about what is it we're putting in our bodies. And when I changed the diet of my family, when my kid was 18, I changed the diet of my family. I was 18 months old and flapping their hands, spinning, walking on toes, definitely 18 months presenting as autistic. Twenty one days later, after completely modifying the diet, I had a completely different kid. Now, they weren't completely cured. There's still evidence of of sensory processing issues we've been dealing with for a lifetime that have lingered. Gut issues, gut biome issues, which all come with kids that are on the spectrum or Asperger's, et cetera. But, you know, I've been so sensitive to what's in our body. And I try to educate my family so that my kids, as they're going into adulthood, that they're making good choices.

[11:50] Well, Nick, I thought that I was making good choices by ordering and going to the grocery store and looking up organic food. And it come to find out that organic food may not. I mean, it might be a better choice, but there are still chemicals in our food that I just was not aware of. He says the team at the Nonprofit Environmental Working Group, or EWG, had a lab test 45 samples of products made with conventionally grown oats and found glyphosate, the active ingredient in the Monsanto Weed Killer Roundup in all but two. So explain for people out there that have never heard of glyphosate or maybe don't know what it is, explain it to us if you've never heard the word. Yeah, glyphosate is basically a weed killer, right? They they spray it on basically a large majority of.

[12:44] Nonorganic foods and in order, and they do this because not only will it prevent the pests from coming to eat it, but it's going to basically prevent other sorts of growths that they do not want. This is an animal study just came out that exposed rats to safe levels of glyphosate that they say humans can be exposed to. It caused over 10 distinct fatal and rare cancers in the rats. When they. Had small amounts of glyphosate in their water, and we have human epidemiological studies showing increased lymphoma risk when you're exposed to glyphosate. And then we have people, a lot of people probably seen this. There's a man that dumped glyphosate on his neck, his his not spray nozzle broke, and it got all over him and he developed a giant tumor. Oh, was that real? I didn't realize that was real. I thought that was AI. That's it. Yeah. They called it an. Alien tumor.

[13:45] It looks alien. Wow. But that's what happens when this stuff is exposed. That's insane. I thought when I saw that, that that was literally AI. I was like, this is AI slop. That's crazy. So so it's used as a weed killer. It's a chemical in a weed killer. How does it get into our bread, into oatmeal, into those products? Yeah. So it gets everywhere because basically once it's sprayed on, you're not going to be able to fully wash it off. And so and a lot of the time it'll actually get inside of whatever it's being sprayed on instead of just staying on the outside. Nobody's really tested this except the Florida Department of Health recently that found 75% of breads, popular breads they tested had glyphosate in it, including organic ones, which include Dave's killer bread. Other case, another major ruling involved Monsanto, as we said, the manufacturer of the weed killer. Roundup. This was a seven to two ruling, and they said that the company cannot be sued for failing to put a cancer warning on Roundup.

[14:50] How how did this happen? You can't put a cancer warning on products that might have Roundup in it. Yeah. And that's very disturbing. I remember that was a Supreme Court ruling a few months ago. And yeah, that was very disturbing. Basically, they claimed because our public health agencies say there's no cancer link, you know, therefore, you know, you know, you can't sue them. Is organic still safer than regular non-organic products or food? Yeah, it's still safer. It's still worth purchasing it just to at least hope there's no glyphosate. Now, a lot of organic products, they're not going to have glyphosate. It's just some of them still will. It'll be in lower amounts if it is than the non-organic one. It's better than the alternative than basically. Yeah, exactly. You'll still want to get it and, you know, just look out for those test results. Again, certain organic brands will have glyphosate. I would just try and avoid those. We're jumping into Halloween candy.

[15:51] Piper, play that Fox News clip. But just three months into Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to eliminate synthetic food dyes from products nationwide, Mars is pushing back. It promised back in 2016 to drop artificial colors, but the company is still using dyes like Red 40, and Yellow 5. All right, so parents and grandparents are about to take the children and the grandchildren out trick-or-treating for Halloween. Some of us are going to be on the front porch of our homes giving away candy. And now they tell us, because there's now been studies that are doing, about chemicals in the candy. What is the worst thing that we're seeing in candy right now? Yeah, and this is very disturbing, and everybody needs to know this for Halloween. So again, we go back to Florida Department of Health. They tested all the popular children's candies, and over 60% of them contained dangerous levels of arsenic.

[16:55] Arsenic is a highly potent poison in carcinogens. You don't want any amount of that. And the worst offenders are some of the best candies, you know, the ones people like. Kit Kats, Tootsie Rolls, Nerds, Sweet Tarts. I heard it was four Twizzlers a year before you reached. Yeah. Yeah, I mean like 60 Nerds, which, how much is 60 Nerds? A quarter of a box? Yeah, exactly. There's thousands of Nerds in a box. So your kid, you know, dumps, you know, drinks a whole, you know, dumps in a whole box of Nerds. He is going to be, or she's going to be way over the safe arsenic consumption limit. Some of us grew up on candy. Like we had no idea we were eating arsenic. How does arsenic get in a Twizzler?

[17:45] We believe that this is occurring because it's something going on at the manufacturing plants. Perhaps all of the metals in the equipment where they process it is leaching arsenic. You get four Twizzlers, kids. That's it. We're just getting riddled with chronic disease because our food's absolute garbage. It is. We're literally eating garbage. I mean, that is a hundred percent, a hundred percent accurate. I am a massive, massive fan. And every week I am sending people that I love your ex posts. I hope that you'll go and follow Nick Holscher. It's very educational, informational. Do your research, read the science. But he's just been fantastic. I want to thank you, Nick, for coming on today. I hope that you'll be back. And I want to thank you for educating the masses, for giving us information that a lot of mainstream media, media will not cover. Big Pharma doesn't want to cover because they lose money in a lot of this.

[18:46] And hospital systems lose money if you're healthy. But also being healthy reduces the cost of health care in this country, which is why we need people like Nick and the McCullough Foundation to be supported through and through. Thank you so much, Nick, for being on. And we'll see you next time. Thanks for having me. Thank you. Can you do me one favor right now? Hit the subscribe button.