Nancy Mace Breaks Down 3 Verdicts the Internet Got WRONG

[00:30] Can you do me one favor right now? Hit the subscribe button. All

[00:55] right, it's Monday night. Already a lot going on. Three verdicts land this week. A jury in Plymouth, Massachusetts decides what a murderous mother owed her children. And then we head down to South Carolina. Tomorrow, South Carolina decides who sits in a Senate nomination for the Republican Party to replace Senator Lindsey Graham. And then last night, Ennis Cantor Freedom was kicked out of a WNBA game because he supports women, of course. And the Internet, TikTok really, but the Internet has already decided, has already ruled on all three. No evidence, no oath, and of course, no idea. So here's my question. When did we start treating feelings like verdicts? The jury box and the voting booth are the last two places on Earth in America where the like,

[01:45] don't count. Thank God. Thank God for that. So this week, both rooms are open. Everything that mattered today. Let's try to be quick. Let's go. In Plymouth, Massachusetts, the Superior Court, the defense rested on Friday. Closing arguments are now and maybe before we even finish watching this. So it's expert against expert in the case right now. It is psychologist for the defense, psychologist for the prosecution, psychologist against psychologist. Which means it's going to go to the 12 strangers in a box, the 12 jurors, thankfully, as it as it should. One of the psychologists were like, you know, Lindsey Clancy has bad days and she has worse days. Yeah, life is hard. And if you are a woman and you've had postpartum, you know how hard it can get. Incredibly hard. And we're going to talk a bit about that. I had postpartum with my second kid, not the first one, but the second one. It was it was incredibly it was harrowing. It was really difficult. And I have sympathy for every mom out there who's been through the same thing.

[02:49] But there's also a reality check we have to talk about because the Internet keeps losing the plot and losing their mind. Here's what nobody in the courtroom is actually arguing about. OK, Lindsey Clancy strangled her three kids. That's what the defense is saying. OK, she strangled them with her hands, her bare hands and exercise bands. Her own lawyer doesn't. Dispute it. The only question that the jury will have to decide will be not did she murder her kids? She did. But the only question is on criminal responsibility. Now to the medication story, because everyone is hung up on two things. One, the pills and two, Patrick did it. That's what they're saying, which is complete horseshit. But on to the medication story, because everybody got online. They only had it half right, as the Internet always does. Lindsey Clancy, based on reporting, had roughly a dozen prescriptions. Testimony says she pushed to change her treatment nearly every day.

[03:49] A friend testified she was weaning herself off a medication. And then, like, for example, in the Zoloft box, the pills that she had her Zoloft prescription in, only seven pills were missing. And by the way, Zoloft doesn't make you kill your kids, by the way. So she wasn't just a patient. It seems apparently it was like she was her own pharmacist. Now, if you were to go into my medical records or your medical records and you look at the prescription, we have, it probably looks like we got a pharmacy in there. But we all know we don't use all of our medications all the time. I know that I don't. I have prescriptions I haven't filled.

[04:25] You know, but meanwhile, outside the courthouse, you have all these women in pink, the pink moms, as we're going to call it. All the women in pink.

[04:38] But really, it's online where it gets really, really gnarly, the pink moms. They're all standing in solidarity. Solidarity with a woman who murdered three of her kids under the age of six. We're not questioning. Well, I'm not. Our side's not questioning whether she murdered it. I mean, if it was anybody else, the defense would have said so in their arguments, and they didn't. It was her. It wasn't anybody else. So online, there are thousands of videos with the same verdict, like, that say that the pills did it. You know, that's not true because she wasn't taking all of her medication.

[05:15] And, you know, she was weaning her. She wasn't taking her off, herself off medication, but the insult is that there are tens of millions of Americans who take this kind of medication, lots of moms, too, lots of moms with postpartum, they get up, they get up early, then they get their kids up, they pack their lunches for the children, they, they take their kids to school, they pick them up in the car line, in the carpool line, and nobody dies, so the pills did it theory is an insult to every mother quietly taking her medication and raising her kids right now. And I want to talk about. I want to talk about the moms on TikTok who are saying, same, Lindsay, same. If you are saying you're the same as Lindsay, are you saying that you, too, are going to murder your children? Because maybe your kids should be taken away.

[06:01] Taking pills or having postpartum isn't an excuse to kill your kids. It's not. I am really upset about the mental health system and how we don't communicate with each other and how that really put her in danger. At some point in this country, we had something called personal and individual responsibility. Why does a mother need to be dependent on the government to have a healthy outcome? Why does a mother have to be dependent on the government or dependent on a hospital or dependent on a pharmacy not to kill her kids? Since when was that the moral clarity?

[06:34] But the darkest theory out there by some of these moms is that the husband did it. Patrick did it for sure. Patrick did it. 100%. Oh. That man did that shit. So, so can you tell me why? I thought he was out of the house. Um. This is a man who went to the. Store for 20 or 30 minutes, came home to find his all of his kids dead.

[06:56] Think about what that requires you to believe her own lawyer. Lindsay's own lawyer stood up in that courtroom for four weeks arguing she killed them. The entire defense is that she wasn't responsible when she did kill them. So to believe the husband did it, you have to believe her defense attorney forgot to mention that his client is innocent and he didn't mercy and accountability. So the defense is that she didn't do it. All of that is just a way of saying that we are not enemies. And anybody who makes you pick one or the other is trying to sell you something. So 12 strangers get that case this week. And I think some of the most disturbing things that have come out of this are what I've seen online by moms. I don't know if you saw this one in the tub. Take a look at this.

[07:48] That mom, that mom apparently throws ice in the tub so she doesn't argue with her toddler. It was her first child. excuse this one this one the woman is talking about how she's just like just like lindsay see ourselves in lindsay many of us know that we could have been only one step away from doing some of those horrific things and if you see this one this one says that she hates all men it's the patriarchy that made lindsay do it you is always always as it is all right then tomorrow south carolina well you get one too then we have an election tomorrow is the runoff for lindsey graham's u.s senate seat it's ralph norman or darlene graham south khan hasn't had an election for a new center in over 20 years it was 2002 was the last was the first time that uh lindsey graham was up for the u.s senate seat when we actually had i think a real open primary and i already told you where i stand i'm with ralph okay let me tell you why in one word homework and this weekend and more videos surfaced uh darlene graham told lawmakers uh this weekend that quote we've got a diversity inclusion committee and she wants to be a leader in it when it comes to dei darlene darlin here you are in all of your dei words and we've done some major things at our agency

[09:18] we're working on all policies and procedures, putting internal controls in place. We've got a diversity inclusion committee. I want to be a leader in state agency when it comes to that. We are really rebuilding. She wants to be a leader in the state in DEI. DEI, Darlene, that is what we're going to call you. I think you found your calling doing the DEI thing. You said you wanted to be a leader in that. If national security isn't her thing, then I guess DEI. She did

[09:54] more than trip up last week over national security. She literally told the nation in her debate last week that national security may not be her thing. And she tells us that in a time of war. And yet she can tell you she'll send your sons and daughters to Tehran immediately if there's a vote on that. So um, I don't know how someone can find the courage to send troops to Iran but not know where Taiwan is on a map. And DEI, DEI, well that's, that's her, that's her thing. And now her campaign says that attacking her over the DEI is attacking, is attacking blind people. It's not. And I want to be real here because it's a complete dodge. Nobody's attacking the commission for the blind in South Carolina. Helping blind South Carolinians find work is the mission. And it's a good mission. But that's not what the video said. Let's watch it again. We've got a diversity inclusion committee. I want to be a leader in state agency when it comes to She wants to be a leader in DEI.

[10:54] DEI, Darlene. The commission for the blind serves people who cannot see. It's the one workplace in America with a built-in excuse to be colorblind, Darlene. DEI is not our thing and we don't want it in the U.S. Senate. So now on the trail,

[11:09] she doesn't like the, she doesn't understand the attacks, doesn't like the attacks. But here's another one for you. So she supports flock cameras, but she doesn't want to be filmed at public events being asked questions. Roll the clip. Is your phone recording this? Yes. Because I mean. Look, tomorrow comes down to who shows up. Runoffs always do. Very few people vote. A rubber stamp only works on people who stay home. And Ralph Norman, he reads the bills. He does the homework and has been the same. He's been the same guy for 30 years. He's been the same guy for 30 years. Tomorrow, South Carolina, be the jury. And speaking of people who think applause is a verdict, last night in Chicago, we finally learned the one unforgivable, unforgivable crime in the WNBA. It's supporting women. And it's not missing free throws. It's not getting blown out by 23 points. The capital offense is wearing a t-shirt that says woman, noun, adult,

[12:15] woman, female. Last night wasn't about basketball. It was about a women's league so allergic to the definition of a woman that it had to eject a man from the game who wore a shirt supporting, you guessed it, women. If the definition of the first letter of the WNBA and their name is too radical, then I think we need to change the name to IDK. I don't know NBA or WTF NBA. Maybe that would be more appropriate. But Ennis Cantor, freedom showed up courtside he cheered when Sophie Cunningham hit a three. And somehow that combination of basic biology and basic manners was too much for the Chicago Sky and the WNBA. There he is. Former NBA center Ennis Cantor, freedom was ejected from a WNBA game between the Indiana Fever and the Chicago Sky after a confrontation with a player. Freedom was on the sidelines wearing a shirt that said, and there you have it. Adult human female. Ennis Cantor, freedom supporting women. This is the same league that still can't publicly define the word woman, yet somehow has a crystal clear policy against against anyone who can.

[13:21] You can rewrite biology, you can expand the definition until it means nothing. But God forbid, forbid, someone shows up with the original version printed on 100% cotton. And that's when the security team gets the call. They wouldn't even tell him why he was being removed. Just you need to leave. Freedom asked the obvious, question on the way out. Do you realize you're only kicking me out because I support women, he said. Because once you admit the shirt is the problem, the whole carefully constructed house of cards starts to fall. And here's why I trust the box and the booth over the TikTok feed. The feed rewards the fastest feeling. The box requires the slowest one. Jurors have to sit there under oath and hear the part that ruins their favorite theory. Nobody on TikTok has to hear anything. You can build a million dollar movement without worried about the race to dailyehate know that once encountering a fact, you didn't order. And in Proverbs 18. The one who states his hart number嘛 دیarsh워 1st, seems right until the other comes and examinesántall.

[14:23] him. The first case got stated on TikTokin week one, and they raised over $1 million. The examination is happening now in Plymouth, in front of 12 people who can't doom scroll their way out of it. And whatever they decide, we will have to accept, the verdict, whatever it may be.

[14:40] يسمعو movement that trades the rule of law for the rule of vibes. We leave that to the pink shirt. So this week let the jury work and tomorrow if you live in South Carolina do your job. One voting booth, one ballot, one vote, one constitutional duty. The likes don't count. There your vote does. And I have one ask tonight. It's the same as it is every night. I see you're not following me. Hit the follow button now.