Nancy Mace Called a BIGOT for Exposing Animal Sacrifices
[00:30] Honey, you need to hit the subscribe button right now. Welcome back. Tonight, we have a city ordinance about animal sacrifices. Then we're gonna head over to Massachusetts to talk about child sacrifices. And there's a Texas court ruling asking a question that should make every adult in the room sit down. And well, lastly, it appears we must address cousin marriages tonight. You know what that's about. And later, I'm gonna debut new segments tonight, Fighter of the Week, Receipts, Hot Mike, and the comment section. You get a say here, and I wanna know exactly what you want to talk about. But before we get started, I did wanna say thank you. We had 75,000 new followers on Facebook alone this week, and we doubled our YouTube subscription. So while I have you, you need to hit the subscribe button right now. And if you're not following me, you need to follow me on whatever app it is you're on tonight. Now is the time.
[01:30] It's time to do the unpopular thing. I hope like hell you saw the viral clip this week in Hamtrak, Michigan. There is a city ordinance permitting animal sacrifices. That's right. You can kill your puppy on the altar of Islam and inclusivity. Way to go, Libs. When you see some of the craziness in towns across the American Midwest, and when I say American Midwest, I mean like the American Middle East, like Hamrick, Michigan, watch this. All over the new ordinance of sacrificing animals. Really ridiculous, catastrophic resolution. If it's not passed, then we are ready to take it to the court for the religious. Backyards are not suitable places for live animal slaughter. Many, many. I agree. Your backyard is probably not the best place for animal slaughter, but the Hamrick City Code has a section called religious animal sacrifice. I kid you not.
[02:30] It says nothing in the animal chapter that can be read to prohibit a bridge or in any way hinder a religious freedom. Then it creates an exemption, ritual handling and preparation of livestock for a ritual slaughter are exempt from the rest of that animal chapter. This isn't a vague cultural statement. It's a government writing a specific Islamic religious exception into its animal code. I want to know where's PETA. And the ordinance gets very specific. It defines a normal humane method as making an animal insensible to pain before it is shackled, hoisted, thrown, cast or cut. It then provides a religious method involving loss of consciousness through the simultaneous instantaneous severance of the carotid arteries with a sharp instrument. I think they mean knives. The ordinance also says waste must be disposed of, under local, state and federal law.
[03:32] So let's just, let's just stop right here. We've got to stop the left from running for cover for radical Islam because that's what this is. That's what they're doing. Second, where the hell is PETA? I don't think the irony is lost on anyone here that radical Islam is taking over the Democrat party and its Democrat cities. And God forbid PETA follow its own beliefs and speak out against animal cruelty.
[04:00] Democrats are going to say, this is just about people practicing their faith.
[04:07] Suicidal empathy. No, it's not. It's about the government setting the precedent for honor killings of animals. What's next? Your daughter? And I don't mean that facetiously. That comment is not bigoted. There are honor killings going on in third world countries right now. It is a thing. Dems will say any concern about animal sacrifices, is an attack on religion. That is a big fat no. A city can respect religious freedom and still protect all of God's creatures. How is the American government condoning, legalizing and giving instruction on how to sacrifice animals? And is this what our founding fathers really intended? I don't think so. And in fact, when you look at this, like most city codes, they're dealing with barking dogs, garbage trucks, garbage cans, storm emergencies.
[05:04] You know, they're dealing with, you know, the guy who stores a boat on cinder blocks in his front yard and you want it to go away. Hamtrak said, hold my beer. I mean, you see all those terrible things and they're like, hold my beer. They decided to write a new law for an instruction manual on how to sacrifice your cat for radical religion. And yes, religious liberty matters. It matters precisely because it requires government to create rules that are clear, equal and enforceable. Not laws that can create a third world shithole because that's what's happening. This is the United States of America. All right, so speaking about animal sacrifices, let's talk about child sacrifices next. You're never gonna believe this and it's exactly what Democrats said they would never do. Massachusetts governor, Maura Healey, signed a bill last week, age 55, here is the law before and after. Before this law went into effect, Massachusetts had a 24 week line for abortions.
[06:11] At that point, a doctor had to fit the case into one of very four specific exceptions, the patient's life, the patient's physical or mental health, a lethal fetal diagnosis or a grave diagnosis incompatible with sustained life outside the womb without extraordinary medical intervention. So they had a 24 week rule. So in other words, the old law had these four boxes that it had to fit into. Age 55, 95 took the boxes, the 24 week red line and ran all four through a paper shredder.
[06:47] The new rule is one sentence. An abortion may be performed by a physician based upon the professional judgment of that physician. That's it.
[07:01] Supporters say the old list was too rigid for tragic, complicated pregnancies. That's a serious argument. But now the legal change is serious too.
[07:14] We're talking about a law that does not literally say abortion up until birth, but it erases all the lines. It erases all of the limitations. A 24 week limit is gone. There are no red lines. It's abortion up until the day of birth. It's just doctor make it so, whatever you say goes. And if that is your position, you need to own it. Don't call it a minor technical update. A minor technical update is your phone asking to restart it at 2 a.m. This is the legislature and a governor allowing the killing of babies up until birth. That's what this is in actual literal terms. I never thought I'd see it in my lifetime. The governor signed it in public and celebrated the murder of babies up until birth. Look at all these smiles.
[08:14] Celebrating the murder of babies up until birth.
[08:19] So here's the question. If the statute no longer gives us a gestational line and the doctor's judgment is now the standard, what is the limit? Are there any limits? And the answer, if the answer is just any doctor gets to decide up until the birth of the child, then just say that. All right. Here we go. Now we're on to a viral video about cousin marriage. I'm not, I'm not even kidding. Let me pull, let me pull the tape. Every Pakistani had or has a crush on his or her cousin. Just get broke. There was a time, yeah, when I had a crush on my cousin. Not gonna lie, bro.
[08:59] Yo, I saw my cousin after a long time again. It was in Pakistan, yeah.
[09:03] Yo, I wanna get married to you. Just let me get chatted to you, man. We Pakistanis, we born to love our cousins. We are born to get married to our cousins. This is our destiny. This is the kismet of the Pakistanis to get married to their cousins, bro. We are supposed to love our mama kibbeti or chaachi kibbeti, bro. Marrying your cousin is the best thing you can do now, baby, so there's no divorce. All right, we are going to get that off my, off the screen. That is, that is gross. It was an almost hysterical clip, but I don't, I'm not sure if you knew this, but cousin marriages and or sexual relations with your cousins are actually legal, legal in most states. And I wish this was a joke, but it's, but it's, it's not actually. And of course, here, here is Troy Jackson. I'm sure you guys saw this. He is the main candidate for Senate. This is a guy that we, it's, I'm gonna call him, a cousin lover who's running for the Senate.
[10:06] He's a cousin lover who Democrats nominated as their Senate candidate in Maine. He didn't marry his cousin, but he had two kids with her. So Maine voters are seeing campaign ads that require a genealogist this election season. He banged his cousin multiple times and had two children with her. So figure that one out. Troy Jackson says this is a personal attack, personal attack. No, it's not. Having sex with your cousin is incest, Troy. And that's what it's called. And it makes you look like an incestuous creep. So most candidates worry about their poll numbers. Troy has to worry about his family reunion being a double date. Talk about homegrown politics. He's taking the concept a little too literally. So it looks like Susan Collins is gonna net a giant, a giant win in this thing. And congrats, Susan. You have already won the race.
[11:10] This week's fighter of the week is a teacher in Texas who broke down in the classroom because his high school seniors can't read and can't write. These kids are leaving high school and going to college and they couldn't fill in four words, four words. I literally broke down in the middle of class. This is only day two.
[11:37] And I have seniors who simply cannot read and seniors who cannot write.
[11:50] Heartbreaking. Habits start at home. And this goes to show it doesn't matter how much money you throw at education. If you don't care, your kid or your grandkid won't be educated. And if you aren't educated, you can't get a good job when you graduate. This is a sad commentary on America's broken educational system. And today we need to totally dismantle the Department of Education before it gets any worse. And we can do that. We do that by block-granting federal dollars back to the states. That's what we could do. The Department of Education really hasn't been around that long. It came about during Carter's administration. It's time to let it go and put the states and put parents back in charge.
[12:34] All right, time now for the comment section, the part where we answer questions from people who've realized the comment section on my social media can sometimes be a landfill. When I say landfill, I actually mean landmine. It can be a terrible place sometimes. But this is interesting from Abby on Facebook. Not sure what it means to get maced, but it sounds like I will at least need a shower after. Abby, get maced is where I'm going to point out the most asinine takes of the left and sometimes the right. And I'll break it down, what's really happening in Washington and across America. Sometimes I tell inappropriate jokes. And yeah, you are definitely going to need to get hosed down after watching an episode, which by the way, be sure you are subscribed. Click that little button right now. And you can hit the little notification bell too while you're at it. From Jeffrey, also on Facebook, asks the question, in your opinion, has the U.S.
[13:37] military effort in the Middle East been successful? And how much longer is Congress going to support this military operation? Jeff, that is a great and a serious question. Here's what the War Powers Resolution means in plain English. The president is supposed to consult Congress before introducing U.S. forces into hostilities, into a war, whenever possible. He or she is to report it, the president is to report it within 48 hours in the circumstances the law describes and end unauthorized operations. And so, if Congress wants to do that, because Congress has authorized hostilities after 60 days. And historically, we've let it stretch into 90 days. So, Congress is the only body that has the authority to declare war, and authorize those kinds of actions. And if those actions extend beyond 90 days, the president has got to come to Congress, even if it's unavoidable military necessity necessity during those 90 days and we're beyond that we're at about six months right now make our military success protect our soldiers protect our assets and inform congress of the exit plan all
[14:45] right now is time for the receipts the receipts is where we take a comment or a story out of the comment section and put it back into full view and tonight's receipt segment comes to you from texas where one temporary court order is about to prove why the wording matters now texas where a surrogacy case somehow has more moving parts than a rental car counter a surrogate from alaska her name is mckenna west and i'm going to throw mckenna up on the screen she's a was carrying a baby for a california couple and in about 20 weeks the baby was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome it's a condition that can be fatal without surgery or medical care and the baby's now been born in dallas west says the intended parents pressured her to end the pregnant pregnancy or to abort the baby texas attorney general ken paxton says the parents wouldn't agree to life-saving surgery after birth this landed in texas in a texas court because west traveled to texas to give birth and texas has a form where she sought emergency protection for the
[15:58] baby the parents deny both claims and they say they want the baby treated and say doctors needed more time and more information before deciding whether the surgery whether what surgery would be appropriate for this child here's what the judge actually did first the baby must receive medically necessary care thank god the biological parents are with the child now who is receiving medical care there's another hearing on on august 25th and where the court has to decide who has legal authority if a newborn needs medically necessary care the grown-ups don't get to turn that child into a contract dispute with a diaper this is a real human life and these decisions can cost the baby his or her life welcome
[16:49] to tonight's hot mic segment dedicated to the liberal white woman who heard the islamic call to prayer and started crying as she contemplated whether or not she should be given medical attention and she must be given medical attention to the child she should become Muslim. We're going to roll the tape.
[17:31] I kid you not. I have one message.
[17:36] I have one message for all these liberal white women. Honey, if you join radical Islam, you won't be able to show your face, your hands, or your hair. And the whites of your eyeballs will be peeking out of this beautiful burqa advertised on Pinterest. That's what they're going to give you. Liberal white women are going to get all of us killed. It's like liberal white women want our rights reversed by centuries. Before I close it out, I couldn't not talk about the WNBA. The league's collective bargaining agreements is only players who are women can play in the WNBA. That's not me paraphrasing. That is the rule. And they met this week. This week, the league's team presidents and general managers and board met to define the word woman in their contracts and discuss transgender athlete eligibility. They left the meeting without any eligibility rules. What is a woman?
[18:35] What is a woman is the question. I'm not sure I understand the question here. The league said there were no immediate eligibility matters and that the conversation will continue and that it denounces bad faith efforts to demean and marginalize people. The women's NBA league could not define the word woman.
[18:59] The women's National Basketball Association. The first letter is not a riddle. It's not a joke. You have a national league for women by women with salaries and a lengthy rule book and a contract. But when the question becomes who is eligible to play in the women's league, suddenly the women's NBA needs a listening session. This is the irony. The WNBA was built because women athletes deserve their own professional stage. Their own category, their own league, their own records and their own competition. You cannot celebrate that mission and then act like the W is a mysterious ancient symbol that only a task force can decode. This is not an argument for treating anybody badly. It's an argument for an organization doing the adult part of its job. Put a clear standard in writing, explain it plainly and defend it consistently.
[19:59] Because women athletes should not have to wait for a committee to decide to define out whether a league even has rules for them. The WNBA has a W. And so, you know, women have wombs, women have uteruses, women ovulate. This isn't rocket science. It's just basic science. And that is bigger than basketball. When an institution is afraid to say what its own rules mean, it's not being compassionate. It's ducking the job and it's leaving the women they're supposed to represent. Behind. Because the same people who tell you a clear boundary is hateful will eventually ask you to surrender that boundary and demand you thank them for the lesson. Some people are going to call me a bigot because I refuse to pretend that clear language is hate. That's fine. I don't reject certain groups of people. I reject bad ideas and bad people. The idea that women's sports don't need clear rules, that Americans must apologize for believing in equal treatment under the law, or that criticizing Islamic extremism is the same thing as attacking all Muslims, it's not.
[21:13] That's a fact. But as we're seeing right now before our eyes, if we allow this invasion, eventually, we're going to have all Islam towns. We don't already. And you won't recognize your own country. If you import the Third World, you become the Third World. And just this week, a school in California was sued because they took their students to a mosque and asked the female students to put on a hijab, and they were given a Koran. And none of the parents knew about it, nor were they informed.
[21:45] This is insanity. The very thing Democrats say is not happening is happening before our eyes. And I'm not going to embrace the diversity of men pretending to be women or the moral courage of liberated women putting on a burqa, covered head to toe. If bigotry means I don't want to give away America's freedom and democracy to radical Islam or the transgender mob, then keep calling me names.
[22:11] A free country can respect every person and still defend its women, its laws, its speech, and its right to say no, that is absolutely crazy. That's not cruelty, that is citizenship. The moral of the story is, as Democrats champion and cheer on diversity, they are cheering on and championing our demise. Democrats keep calling every boundary bigotry and every objection hate. But diversity is not the problem, confusion is. And a country that treats common sense like a hate crime will not stay free for long. I love freedom, I love the Constitution, and I love America. And I will not apologize for defending all three.
[23:02] I see you're not following me. Click that button and hit the follow so you can subscribe. Click that button and hit the follow so you can subscribe.